Regresar

How Transitional Justice Processes and Official Apologies Influence Reconciliation: The Case of the Chilean 'Truth and Reconciliation' and 'Political Imprisonment and Torture' Commissions

Abstract:

Perceptions of the 'Truth and Reconciliation' and 'Political Imprisonment and Torture' commissions and related beliefs, emotions and socio-emotional climate were analysed in people affected and unaffected by past political violence in Chile (N=1278). People directly affected regard institutional apologies as less sincere and effective, and they were more critical of the commissions. Those who have a positive appraisal of the commissions, compared with people who disagree with the commissions activities, are less prone to forget past collective violence; report higher levels of negative emotions, such as shame, and positive ones, such as pride and hope, about the collective past; and consider that the commissions contributed to knowing the truth about what happened to victims and helped bring human rights violators to justice. Those appraising the commissions in a positive fashion also perceive a more positive emotional climate and inter-group trust, have more confidence in institutions and report more universalistic values. A multiple-regression analysis suggests that commissions play a relatively successful role as transitional justice rituals, reinforcing reconciliation. © 2015 John Wiley