Is the p-value properly interpreted by critical care professionals? Online survey


Abstract:

Objective: To determine the prevalence of and risk factors for insufficient knowledge related to p-values among critical care physicians and respiratory therapists in Argentina. Methods: This cross-sectional online survey contained 25 questions about respondents' characteristics, selfperception and p-value knowledge (theory and practice). Descriptive and multivariable logistic regression analyses were conducted. Results: Three hundred seventysix respondents were analyzed. Two hundred thirty-seven respondents (63.1%) did not know about p-values. According to the multivariable logistic regression analysis, a lack of training on scientific research methodology (adjusted OR 2.50; 95%CI 1.37 - 4.53; p = 0.003) and the amount of reading (< 6 scientific articles per year; adjusted OR 3.27; 95%CI 1.67 - 6.40; p = 0.001) were found to be independently associated with the respondents' lack of p-value knowledge. Conclusion: The prevalence of insufficient knowledge regarding p-values among critical care physicians and respiratory therapists in Argentina was 63%. A lack of training on scientific research methodology and the amount of reading (< 6 scientific articles per year) were found to be independently associated with the respondents' lack of p-value knowledge.

Año de publicación:

2021

Keywords:

  • Data interpretation, statistical
  • Biostatistics
  • Biomedical research/statistics &amp; numerical data
  • evidence-based medicine
  • PREVALENCE
  • Hypothesis Testing

Fuente:

scopusscopus

Tipo de documento:

Review

Estado:

Acceso restringido

Áreas de conocimiento:

  • Estadísticas
  • Estadísticas

Áreas temáticas:

  • Otros problemas y servicios sociales
  • Medicina y salud
  • Funcionamiento de bibliotecas y archivos