Safety threshold of R-wave amplitudes in patients with implantable cardioverter defibrillator

Abstract:

Objective A safety threshold for baseline rhythm R-wave amplitudes during follow-up of implantable cardioverter defibrillators (ICD) has not been established. We aimed to analyse the amplitude distribution and undersensing rate during spontaneous episodes of ventricular fibrillation (VF), and define a safety amplitude threshold for baseline R-waves. Methods Data were obtained from an observational multicentre registry conducted at 48 centres in Spain. Baseline R-wave amplitudes and VF events were prospectively registered by remote monitoring. Signal processing algorithms were used to compare amplitudes of baseline R-waves with VF R-waves. All undersensed R-waves after the blanking period (120 ms) were manually marked. Results We studied 2507 patients from August 2011 to September 2014, which yielded 229 VF episodes (cycle length 189.6}29.1 ms) from 83 patients that were suitable for R-wave comparisons (follow-up 2.7 }2.6 years). The majority (77.6%) of VF R-waves (n=13953) showed lower amplitudes than the reference baseline R-wave. The decrease in VF amplitude was progressively attenuated among subgroups of baseline R-wave amplitude (≥17≥12 to 17≥7 to 12;≥2.2 to 7 mV) from the highest to the lowest: median deviations-51.2% to +22.4%, respectively (p=0.027). There were no significant differences in undersensing rates of VF R-waves among subgroups. Both the normalised histogram distribution and the undersensing risk function obtained from the ≥2.2 to 7 mV subgroup enabled the pbkp_rediction that baseline R-wave amplitudes ≤1.2.5 mV (interquartile range: 2.3.2.8 mV) may lead to ≥25% of undersensed VF R-waves. Conclusions Baseline R-wave amplitudes ≤2.5 mV during follow-up of patients with ICDs may lead to high risk of delayed detection of VF.

Año de publicación:

2016

Keywords:

Fuente:

scopus